Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Oellacherite

A variety of Muscovite
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About OellacheriteHide

Formula:
KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Lustre:
Sub-Vitreous, Pearly
Hardness:
2 - 2½
Specific Gravity:
2.884 - 2.994
Name:
Named in 1867 by James Dwight Dana in honor of Josef Oellacher [February 16, 1804 Pressburg, Austria - August 16, 1880 Innsbruck, Austria], a chemical pharmacist who first investigated a similar mineral (Oellacher, 1862) and thought it was margarite. The original oellacherite was from Kemmat, Sterzing (Vipiteno), Vizze Valley (Pfitsch Valley), Bolzano Province (South Tyrol), Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy. Because true margarite was discovered near Mt. Grenier, about 19 km distant from the oellacherite locality, there was some confusion that the two micas might be equivalent. Oellacher's (1862) chemical analysis was clearly not consistent with margarite (Des Cloizeaux, 1867), but it was unusual in its chemistry containing Ba, Na, Ca, etc. Des Cloizeaux's specimens were sent to him by Karl Rammelsberg labeled "Baryt-glimmer" and their optic properties seemed more consistent with muscovite. The chemical anomaly prompted Dana to re-name the species oellacherite. In 1933, Lawson H. Bauer and Harry Berman studied "oellacherite" from Franklin, New Jersey, USA, and re-named it, "barium muscovite", for its chemical relationship to muscovite, but the mineral studied was not Ba-dominant, either, although it too had anomalous chemical and physical properties.
A green to colorless, Ba-bearing/rich variety of muscovite; it forms a complete series with ganterite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
10596 (as Oellacherite)
2815 (as Muscovite)
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:10596:7 (as Oellacherite)
mindat:1:1:2815:4 (as Muscovite)

Similar NamesHide

Physical Properties of OellacheriteHide

Sub-Vitreous, Pearly
Transparency:
Transparent
Streak:
White
Hardness:
2 - 2½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Flexible
Cleavage:
Perfect
{001}
Fracture:
Micaceous
Density:
2.884 - 2.994 g/cm3 (Measured)    

Chemistry of OellacheriteHide

Mindat Formula:
KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O48.202 %
Si21.154 %
Al20.322 %
K9.816 %
H0.506 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Geological Setting:
Fine-grained granular dolomite.

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
4 photos of Oellacherite associated with PyriteFeS2
3 photos of Oellacherite associated with DolomiteCaMg(CO3)2
2 photos of Oellacherite associated with MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
2 photos of Oellacherite associated with SphaleriteZnS
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with MicroclineK(AlSi3O8)
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with AndraditeCa3Fe3+2(SiO4)3
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with HendricksiteKZn3(Si3Al)O10(OH)2
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with GalenaPbS
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with RealgarAs4S4
1 photo of Oellacherite associated with Wallisite(Cu,Ag)TlPbAs2S5

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 9.8161% 3,043 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for OellacheriteHide

References for OellacheriteHide

Localities for OellacheriteHide

Showing 20 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Australia
 
  • New South Wales
    • Yancowinna Co.
      • Broken Hill district
        • Broken Hill
Mason (1987)
Austria
 
  • Salzburg
    • Zell am See District
      • Bramberg am Wildkogel
        • Nasenkopf mountain
          • Leckbachgraben
Strasser (1989)
Brazil
 
  • Goiás
    • Mara Rosa
      • Mara Rosa Gold Project
OLIVEIRA et al. (2000)
China
 
  • Shaanxi
    • Shangluo
      • Zhashui County
Jiang et al. (1996)
Jiang et al. (1996)
DR Congo
 
  • Haut-Katanga
    • Kipushi Territory
      • Kipushi
Kampunzu et al. (2009)
Iraq
 
  • Sulaymaniyah Governorate
    • Penjwen District
Mohammad et al. (2007)
Italy
 
  • Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
    • South Tyrol
Exel (1993)
New Zealand
 
  • West Coast Region
    • Westland District
      • Burke River
Cooper (1996)
Russia
 
  • Irkutsk Oblast
    • Bodaybinsky District
      • Bodaibo
        • Lena Gold District
          • Kropotkinsky ore cluster
Rusinov et al. (2008)
  • Krasnoyarsk Krai
Kovalev et al. (2023)
South Korea
 
  • North Chungcheong Province
    • Boeun County
Gi Young Jeong (2006)
    • Goesan County
Gi Young Jeong (2006)
Spain
 
  • Galicia
    • Lugo
      • Incio
        • Vila de Mouros
          • Pacios
Kilias et al. (2006)
Switzerland
 
  • Valais
    • Brig
      • Ried-Brig
        • Ganter valley
          • Wasen Alp
Graeser et al. (2003) +1 other reference
    • Goms
      • Binn
        • Fäld
Graeser et al. (1987) +3 other references
50. (in German) +1 other reference
    • Sierre
      • Anniviers
        • Ayer
Stalder et al. (1998)
UK
 
  • Scotland
    • Perth and Kinross
      • Aberfeldy
Coats (1980) +1 other reference
USA
 
  • New Jersey
    • Sussex County
      • Franklin
Bauer et al. (1933)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 03:14:15 Page updated: July 31, 2026 19:26:47
Go to top of page