Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Quartz vs. Asagiite
It's a classic vs a newbie as the most common named mineral in the crust Quartz is up against an exceedingly-rare sea foam-green mineral discovered just a few years ago Asagiite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Psilomelane from
Erwin and Cardin Prospect, Tellico Plains, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA


Locality type:Prospect
Classification
Species:'Psilomelane' (not an IMA approved species)
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Psilomelane data
Locality Data:Click here to view Erwin and Cardin Prospect, Tellico Plains, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:948401
Long-form Identifier:1:3:948401:6
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Psilomelane
5.1km (3.2 miles) ⓘGround Hog Mountain Prospect, Tellico Plains, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
6.5km (4.0 miles) ⓘKilby Prospect, Tellico Plains, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
21.4km (13.3 miles) ⓘMcDonald Prospect, Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Eastern Belt, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
21.6km (13.4 miles) ⓘKimbrough Prospect, Madisonville, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
26.0km (16.2 miles) ⓘHeiskill Mine, Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Eastern Belt, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
28.9km (18.0 miles) ⓘHansard Prospect, Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Central Belt, McMinn County, Tennessee, USA
30.2km (18.8 miles) ⓘSouth Vida Mine, Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Eastern Belt, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
30.9km (19.2 miles) ⓘPreston Prospect, Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Eastern Belt, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
31.5km (19.6 miles) ⓘBishop and Associates Prospect, Charleston Mining District, McMinn County, Tennessee, USA
31.8km (19.8 miles) ⓘMcGuire Mine (North Vida Mine), Sweetwater Barite Mining District-Eastern Belt, Monroe County, Tennessee, USA
References
Stose, G.W.; Schrader, F.C. (1923) Manganese deposits of east Tennessee. Bulletin 737. US Geological Survey doi:10.3133/b737
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 6, 2026 01:33:18
Go to top of page