Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Duftite from
Tsumeb Mine (Ongopolo Mine), Tsumeb, Oshikoto Region, Namibia


Locality type:Mine
Classification
Species:Duftite
Formula:PbCu(AsO4)(OH)
Comments:Guillemin (1956) proposed that compositions close to end member duftite – PbCu(AsO4)(OH) – are isostructural with descloizite. He called duftites of this composition α-duftite and found that it could readily be synthesised in the laboratory. However, he also found that certain duftites with more than about 20% substitution of calcium for lead were isomorphous with conichalcite and could not be synthesised. He proposed the name β-duftite for these compositions and suggested that β-duftite forms a series with conichalcite.

The distinction between these two “polymorphs” was quite important at Tsumeb in the 1970s and 1980s, because they accounted for a significant proportion of the lead (and to a smaller extent copper) in certain ore types but responded quite differently to the flotation process in the concentrator. Because of this, former Tsumeb Corporation mineralogist John Innes encouraged various technical and academic studies of these minerals. The “duftite problem” has been discussed by several authors, but the most relevant to a simple explanation are as follows:

Jambor et al. (1980) examined a series of calcian duftite and plumbian conichalcite specimens from Tsumeb and concluded that complete solid solution probably exists between the duftite and conichalcite, and they proposed that β-duftite is merely an intermediate in the duftite-conichalcite series (as opposed to a distinct polymorph).

Kharisun et al. (1998) studied the structure of duftite, conichalcite and of intermediate compositions. They agreed with Jambor et al. (1980) that “β-duftite” is not a distinct mineral but rather a composition, or series of compositions, within the duftite-conichalcite series. However, the relationship is not one of simple solid solution; instead, modulated structures comprising domains of different composition occur. This explains why Guillemin (1956) had been unable to synthesise his beta polymorph, but it also indicates that “β-duftite” is not a valid mineral!

Burke (2006) included “duftite-beta” among minerals officially discredited by the IMA.

So much for “β-duftite”, but it is interesting (to us Tsumeb geeks anyway) that Jambor et al. (1980) also demonstrated extensive solid solution between conichalcite and austinite. They noted, though, that no compositions with both Pb>Ca and Zn>Cu had been found at that time, but that any such compositions found in the future would be an “as-yet-undescribed new member of the adelite group”. Such compositions were later found, leading to the description of a new mineral – arsenodescloizite (Keller and Dunn, 1980) for which Tsumeb is the type locality.

My good friend Paul Carr and I’ve recently run about 250 quantitative analyses of Tsumeb duftites, conichalcites and austinites. The compositions are shown in the accompanying chart. Duftite plots in the bottom left quadrant; conichalcite in the bottom right; austinite in the top right, and (much rarer) arsenodescloizite in the top left quadrant. As you can see, a very wide range of compositions are present.

While it's usually possible to identify austinite by visual means, the distinction between conichalcite and duftite is much more difficult. I’ve learned that in the absence of an analysis, it’s much safer to label these things as “duftite / conichalcite series”.

Malcolm Southwood.

References:

Burke, E. A. J. (2006). A mass discreditation of GQN minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 44, 1557–1560.

Guillemin, C. (1956). Contribution a la minéralogie des arséniates, phosphates, et vanadates de cuivre. Bulletin de la Société Français Minéralogie et de Cristallographie, 79, 7-95.

Jambor, J.L., Owens, D.R. and Dutrizac, J.E. (1980). Solid solution in the adelite group of arsenates. The Canadian Mineralogist, 18, 191-195.

Kharisun, Taylor, M. R., Bevan, D. J. M. and Pring, A. (1998). The crystal chemistry of duftite, PbCuAsO4(OH) and the beta-duftite problem. Mineralogical Magazine, 62, 121-130.
Confirmation
Validity:Valid - Type Locality
Associated Minerals:
Associates:Azurite
Associated Minerals Based on Photo Data:
Calcite622
- var Lead-bearing Calcite1
Dioptase241
Cerussite145
Dolomite124
- var Cobalt-bearing Dolomite23
- var Manganese-bearing Dolomite1
- var Zinc-bearing Dolomite1
Malachite79
Mimetite56
Wulfenite56
Smithsonite44
Azurite37
Tsumcorite22
Hematite21
Quartz17
- var Rock Crystal1
Goethite14
Mottramite13
Jamesite13
Minrecordite12
Arsentsumebite12
Cuprite10
- var Chalcotrichite1
Plancheite8
Rosasite7
Olivenite7
Anglesite7
Willemite7
Hydrozincite7
Aragonite7
- var Lead-bearing Aragonite6
- var Zinc-bearing Aragonite1
Gartrellite6
Tennantite Subgroup5
Zincolivenite5
Native Silver5
- var Amalgam1
Otavite4
Hydrocerussite4
Bayldonite4
Galena3
Austinite2
Agardite-(Ce)2
Conichalcite2
Beudantite1
Beaverite-(Cu)1
Minium1
Duftite-alpha1
Segnitite1
Leadhillite1
Tangeite1
Pyrolusite1
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Duftite data
Locality Data:Click here to view Tsumeb Mine (Ongopolo Mine), Tsumeb, Oshikoto Region, Namibia
Photo GalleryView Gallery (143 photos)
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:4699
Long-form Identifier:1:3:4699:2
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Duftite
50.1km (31.2 miles) Kupferberg Mine, Otavi Constituency, Otjozondjupa Region, Namibia
53.6km (33.3 miles) Kombat Mine, Kombat, Otavi Constituency, Otjozondjupa Region, Namibia
References
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 02:09:04
Go to top of page