Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Native Sulphur from
Duval Fort Stockton Mine (Fort Stockton Sulfur Mine; Heiner Mine), Pecos County, Texas, USA


03162160017362237811109.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
05916790017362237813813.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
05417120017271983814424.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
05916790017362237813813.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
05417120017271983814424.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
05916790017362237813813.jpg
Native Sulphur, etc.

Duval Fort Stockton Mine, Pecos County, Texas, USA
Locality type:Mine
Classification
Species:Native Sulphur
Formula:S8
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Associated Minerals Based on Photo Data:
Dolomite2
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Native Sulphur data
Locality Data:Click here to view Duval Fort Stockton Mine (Fort Stockton Sulfur Mine; Heiner Mine), Pecos County, Texas, USA
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:200613
Long-form Identifier:1:3:200613:0
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Native Sulphur
7.3km (4.5 miles) ⓘFarmland Industries Mine (ARCO Mine; Sinclair Mine; Fort Stockton Mine; Texasgulf Mine), Pecos County, Texas, USA
12.9km (8.0 miles) ⓘUnnamed Prospect, Pecos County, Texas, USA
16.3km (10.1 miles) ⓘCommache Creek Mine (Texas Gulf Mine), Pecos County, Texas, USA
16.6km (10.3 miles) ⓘComanche Creek Well Site, Pecos County, Texas, USA
References
McNeal, R. P., & Hemenway, G. A. (1972). Geology of Fort Stockton Sulfur Mine, Pecos County, Texas. AAPG Bulletin, 56(1), 26-37.
Smith, Arthur E. (1991) Texas Mineral Locality Index. Rocks & Minerals, 66 (3) 196-224 doi:10.1080/00357529.1991.11761622
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 09:34:22
Go to top of page