Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Quartz vs. Asagiite
It's a classic vs a newbie as the most common named mineral in the crust Quartz is up against an exceedingly-rare sea foam-green mineral discovered just a few years ago Asagiite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Muscovite from
Sangri Cu deposit, Baingoin Co. (Bange Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China


Locality type:Deposit
Classification
Species:Muscovite
Formula:KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Muscovite data
Locality Data:Click here to view Sangri Cu deposit, Baingoin Co. (Bange Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:1502767
Long-form Identifier:1:3:1502767:6
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Muscovite
19.5km (12.1 miles) ⓘXiongmei Cu deposit, Xiongmei, Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
30.5km (19.0 miles) ⓘZanzongcuo, Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
30.6km (19.0 miles) ⓘShesuo Cu-polymetallic deposit, Xiongmei, Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
35.2km (21.9 miles) ⓘBangkog Co (Bangkog Tso; Bange Cuo; Bangge Cuo), Baingoin Co. (Bange Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
43.3km (26.9 miles) ⓘSiling Co (Siling Tso; Selin Cuo), Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
50.3km (31.2 miles) ⓘKese granite, Baingoin Co. (Bange Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
65.3km (40.5 miles) ⓘNaka Co (Naka Tso), Baingoin Co. (Bange Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
87.5km (54.4 miles) ⓘGuojialin lake, Nyima Co. (Nima Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
98.1km (60.9 miles) ⓘNancuo, Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
98.1km (60.9 miles) ⓘGariatong skarn-type Pb-Zn ore body, Xainza Co. (Shenzha Co.), Nagqu, Tibet, China
References
Lin, B., Zou, B., Tang, P., He, W., Liu, Z., Qi, J., ... & Sun, M. (2022). Multiple isotopic dating constrains the time framework (Age) of a porphyry system: A case study from the Sangri Cu-Mo deposit, Bangongco-Nujiang metallogenic belt, Tibet, China. Ore Geology Reviews, 144, 104870.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 6, 2026 07:54:31
Go to top of page