Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Quartz vs. Asagiite
It's a classic vs a newbie as the most common named mineral in the crust Quartz is up against an exceedingly-rare sea foam-green mineral discovered just a few years ago Asagiite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Schist from
South McCracken Feldspar and Kaolin Prospect, Bryson City Feldspar Mining District, Swain County, North Carolina, USA


Locality type:Prospect
Classification
Type:Schist
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Schist data
Locality Data:Click here to view South McCracken Feldspar and Kaolin Prospect, Bryson City Feldspar Mining District, Swain County, North Carolina, USA
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:1042333
Long-form Identifier:1:3:1042333:4
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Schist
22.8km (14.2 miles) ⓘWestfeldt Prospect (Kolb-Westfeldt; Westerveldt), Swain County Copper Mining District (Fontana Mining District), Swain County, North Carolina, USA
26.1km (16.2 miles) ⓘTalc Prospect (MRDS - 10026152), Murphy Marble Belt, Swain County, North Carolina, USA
28.2km (17.5 miles) ⓘFontana Mine, Swain County Copper Mining District (Fontana Mining District), Swain County, North Carolina, USA
35.6km (22.1 miles) ⓘWoods prospect, Jackson County, North Carolina, USA
51.8km (32.2 miles) ⓘShooting Creek Placer, Clay County, North Carolina, USA
51.9km (32.3 miles) ⓘHayes-Hoblitzell Mine, Murphy Marble Belt, Cherokee County, North Carolina, USA
59.6km (37.1 miles) ⓘEliot and Leatherwood Iron Prospect, Brasstown-Peachtree Belt, Murphy Marble Belt, Cherokee County, North Carolina, USA
59.9km (37.2 miles) ⓘJ. W. Cooper Prospect, Brasstown Belt, Murphy Marble Belt, Cherokee County, North Carolina, USA
63.9km (39.7 miles) ⓘNewfound Gap Olivine deposit, Canton-Democrat, Buncombe County, North Carolina, USA
67.8km (42.1 miles) ⓘWellborn Hill Mine, Towns County, Georgia, USA
References
(2005) Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS), US Geological Survey.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 6, 2026 07:02:50
Go to top of page