Hoi,
Moldavian was created before the start of the language committee.. so no
responsibility at all for the language committee; it was not involved.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:52 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/11/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com>:
> > Hoi,
> > With the ISO 639-3 standard we have the best standard that is available.
> It
> > is the only standard that ties in with what we do; publish on the
> Internet.
> > When you know about the policies of the language committee, you would
> know
> > that it only expresses opinions about requests for new projects and
> > languages. The question of what I personally find is not that relevant as
> a
> > consequence.
> >
> > I am not interested into our Moldavian issue per se, I have found and I
> > still find that it is very much a political issue. An issue that has been
> > dealt with by the closure of the wiki. When I look at how comparable
> > situations were dealt with elsewhere, I am not impressed. Let it be clear
> > that the mo code is still legal. It may still be used.
> > Thanks,
> > Gerard
>> So you are taking the collective responsibility route? Have the other
> memebers agreed to this?
>>> --
> geni
>> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
>foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l>
