Crowdsourcing research can balance discussions, validate findings and better inform policy, say Raphael Silberzahn and Eric L. Uhlmann.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Subjects
References
Silberzahn, R. & Uhlmann, E. L. Psychol. Sci. 24, 2437â2444 (2013).
Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U. & Uhlmann, E. L. Psychol. Sci. 25, 1504â1505 (2014).
Silberzahn, R. et al. Preprint available at https://osf.io/j5v8f (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth 2015-Oct-07
Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility 2015-Sep-01
Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test 2015-Aug-27
First results from psychologyâs largest reproducibility test 2015-Apr-30
Scientific method: Statistical errors 2014-Feb-12
Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive 2013-Nov-20
Weak statistical standards implicated in scientific irreproducibility 2013-Nov-11
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work. Nature 526, 189â191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/526189a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/526189a