Jump to content

Stéphane Mallarmé

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stéphane Mallarmé
Mallarmé in 1896, in a photograph by Nadar
Mallarmé in 1896, in a photograph by Nadar
BornÉtienne Mallarmé
(1842-03-18)18 March 1842
Paris, France
Died9 September 1898(1898-09-09) (aged 56)
Valvins, Seine-et-Marne, France
Resting placeSamoreau Cemetery, Seine-et-Marne
OccupationPoet, teacher, translator, critic
LanguageFrench
Literary movementSymbolism
Notable worksHérodiade; L'Après-midi d'un faune; Igitur; Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard
SpouseMaria Christina Gerhard
Children2

Signature

Stéphane Mallarmé (18 March 1842 – 9 September 1898) was a French poet, teacher, translator, and critic. His birth name was Étienne Mallarmé, but he used the name Stéphane for his writing. He became one of the main poets of Symbolism. Symbolism was an art movement that used images, sounds, and signs to suggest ideas and feelings. It did not try to describe the visible world in a plain and direct way.[1]

Mallarmé wrote only a small number of poems, but his work changed the history of poetry. He wanted every word to do several things at the same time. A word could name an object, but it could also bring other words, sounds, memories, and ideas into the reader's mind. For this reason, his poems often have more than one possible meaning. Their grammar can also be difficult to follow. Mallarmé believed that a poem should not explain an object directly. Instead, it should slowly make the idea of the object appear in the reader's mind.[2]

His best-known works include the unfinished dramatic poem Hérodiade, the monologue L'Après-midi d'un faune (The Afternoon of a Faun), the prose work Igitur, and the page poem Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard (A Throw of the Dice Will Never Do Away with Chance). In this last work, Mallarmé used letters of different sizes and large areas of empty paper. The reader must look at the whole pair of pages as well as read the words. The poem became an important early example of visual poetry.[3]

Mallarmé also had a strong influence on music, painting, theatre, and dance. Édouard Manet was his friend and made pictures for two of his books. Claude Debussy used The Afternoon of a Faun as the starting point for a famous work for orchestra. Vaslav Nijinsky later created a ballet from the poem and Debussy's music. Mallarmé also wrote about Richard Wagner, modern theatre, ballet, and the new painting of his time.

He did not believe that poetry should simply copy music. He wanted poetry to use the full power of language. This included meaning, sound, rhythm, silence, and the shape of the words on the printed page.[4]

For much of his life, Mallarmé worked as an English teacher. His public life seemed quiet, but his inner life and his writing were not quiet. He spent many years working on texts that he never finished. He also planned a great work called Le Livre (The Book). It would have brought together poetry, reading, theatre, and a public ceremony. Only plans and notes for this work remain.

Mallarmé held meetings at his home on Tuesday evenings. These meetings were known as the Mardis. They made him an important figure in the artistic life of Paris at the end of the nineteenth century. Younger writers such as Paul Valéry, André Gide, and Paul Claudel came to listen to him there.[5]

Family and childhood

[change | change source]

Mallarmé was born in Paris on 18 March 1842. His father, Numa-Florent-Joseph Mallarmé, worked in the French government office that kept records of land and property. His mother was Élisabeth-Félicie Desmolins. People on both sides of the family had worked for the government for many years. The family expected the boy to enter the same kind of career.[6]

His mother died in 1847, when he was five years old. His father married Anne-Hubertine Mathieu the next year. Mallarmé spent much of his childhood with relatives or in boarding schools. He was very close to his younger sister, Maria. She died in 1857 at the age of thirteen.[7]

These early deaths do not explain all of Mallarmé's poetry in a simple way. However, the lost mother, the dead sister, the lonely child, and the empty family home appear again in some of his early poems and prose poems.[8]

He first studied near Paris and later at the school in Sens. He was not an excellent pupil in most subjects. He did well in English, French writing, and some classical subjects. He also began to write poetry.[7]

His early poems followed writers such as Alphonse de Lamartine, Victor Hugo, Théophile Gautier, and Charles Baudelaire. These first poems show a young writer copying poets whom he admired. They do not show that he already had a complete theory of poetry. Mallarmé found his own style slowly.[9]

The death of his sister had an important place in his first poems. Another young friend, Harriet Smyth, died in 1859. Mallarmé wrote poems about graves, angels, memory, and the hope of life after death. At this time, he still used the language of Christianity.[10]

Later, his religious belief became less certain. However, religious forms remained important in his thought. He continued to think about ceremony, sacrifice, death, rebirth, and a group of people joined together by a shared act.[11]

Mallarmé failed his first school-leaving examination in August 1860. He passed it in November. He then worked for a short time in a government office. He disliked the future that his family had planned for him. Poetry had already become the centre of his life.[12]

Baudelaire, Poe, and England

[change | change source]

Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du mal gave the young Mallarmé a new model. Baudelaire showed that modern poetry could bring together beauty, illness, boredom, desire, city life, and death. At first, Mallarmé borrowed many of Baudelaire's images and tones. He later moved away from direct copying, but Baudelaire remained one of the poets whom he respected most.[13]

Edgar Allan Poe became another major influence. Mallarmé knew Poe through Baudelaire's French translations. Poe's essays described a poem as the result of careful work, not only of sudden inspiration. This idea helped Mallarmé bring together poetic feeling and careful method, choice, correction, and planning. He came to believe that a poet must work as both a dreamer and a maker.[14]

In 1862, Mallarmé met Maria Christina Gerhard, a young German woman who worked as a companion. She was older than he was. They travelled to London so that Mallarmé could improve his English and gain a teaching qualification. Their first stay was difficult, and Maria returned to France for a time.[15]

Mallarmé returned to France in 1863 and later went back to England with Maria. They married on 10 August 1863. During his studies in England, he began translating Poe. He later translated many of Poe's poems into French, including The Raven.[16]

One of Manet's pictures for Mallarmé's 1875 translation of Poe's The Raven

Mallarmé's translations were important for his own poetry. English word order and Poe's patterns of sound made him think about what the French language could do. Translation also showed him that a word in one language does not always have one complete and exact partner in another language. A translator must choose between several possible meanings and effects. Mallarmé later placed the same kind of pressure on the words in his own poems.[17]

The years as a provincial teacher

[change | change source]

Late in 1863, Mallarmé became an assistant English teacher at the school in Tournon-sur-Rhône. He and Maria lived there with little money. Their daughter, Geneviève, was born on 19 November 1864.

Mallarmé found classroom work tiring and often painful. He had a quiet voice and found it difficult to control noisy groups of boys. School reports often judged him to be a weak teacher. He also had to prepare lessons and correct work after the school day. This left him little time for poetry.[18]

Even so, the years at Tournon were very important for his writing. He wrote at night and developed a slow method of correcting and changing his work. He began Hérodiade in 1864. In 1865, he began the work that later became L'Après-midi d'un faune. He also wrote prose poems such as Le Démon de l'analogie (The Demon of Analogy).[19]

In a letter from this period, Mallarmé said that he wanted to show not the thing itself, but the effect that it produces. This became one of the clearest statements of his early poetic method.[20]

In 1866, eleven of his poems appeared in the first volume of Le Parnasse contemporain. This book brought together poets connected with Parnassianism. The Parnassian poets valued careful form, distance from private feeling, and exact artistic work. Mallarmé shared these aims, but he soon moved beyond them. He wanted a poem to create an unseen order through the relations between its words.[21]

Mallarmé's crisis began while he was still teaching at Tournon in the spring of 1866. Letters from this time describe illness, lack of sleep, fear that he could no longer write, the loss of religious faith, and an encounter with what he called le Néant, or Nothingness.[22]

Later in 1866, he moved to Besançon, and in 1867 to Avignon. The word Néant does not mean only empty despair. It can also mean the removal of easy beliefs and meanings that are already prepared. Poetry would have to begin again after this loss.[23]

Critics have explained this crisis in different ways. Guy Michaud gives it an important place in Mallarmé's search for a new kind of poetry. Charles Chadwick studies the movement of thought inside the poems and letters. The evidence also shows that Mallarmé suffered a personal and artistic breakdown.[24]

Mallarmé did not stop writing after the crisis. Instead, he changed his idea of the poet. The poet was no longer only a person who expressed private feelings. The poet became a worker who allowed language to create relations that were larger than one human life.[25]

During the same period, Mallarmé wrote parts of Igitur. Its young hero enters a dark family house at midnight. He tries to complete an act that will defeat chance, but the work remains unfinished. The text is at the same time a family story, a test of ideas, an action for the stage, and a study of writing. Its unfinished form is part of its importance in literary history.[26]

Paris and a larger artistic world

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's son Anatole was born on 16 July 1871. In the same year, the family moved to Paris. Mallarmé taught at the Lycée Fontanes, now called the Lycée Condorcet. He later taught at the Lycée Janson-de-Sailly and the Collège Rollin. In all, he worked as a teacher for about thirty years.[27]

Paris gave him a larger circle of writers and artists. He became a close friend of Manet. He also knew Berthe Morisot, James McNeill Whistler, Odilon Redon, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, and other artists.[28]

These friendships were not only social. Mallarmé thought deeply about painting, books, pictures in books, and the place of art in modern life.[29]

Manet's portrait of Mallarmé, painted in 1876

In 1874, Mallarmé wrote and edited a fashion magazine called La Dernière Mode (The Latest Fashion). Only eight issues were published. He wrote most of the magazine himself, using several different names, including names that appeared to belong to women.[30]

He wrote about clothes, theatre, food, travel, the design of homes, and social behaviour. The magazine shows a playful side of Mallarmé. It also shows his interest in surfaces, objects, style, and the modern press. He could write clear and practical prose when the subject required it.[31]

Front page of an illustrated fashion magazine
A number of La Dernière Mode from 1874

In 1874, the family began spending holidays at Valvins, near the Forest of Fontainebleau. The small house beside the Seine became one of the most important places in Mallarmé's life. He sailed, worked in the garden, received friends, and wrote there.[1]

The quiet river landscape entered his prose and letters. Valvins was not a complete escape from society. It was a place where private work and friendly meetings could exist together.[32]

Mallarmé's house at Valvins, painted by Édouard Vuillard in 1896

In 1875, the family moved to 87 rue de Rome in Paris. This apartment later became famous because of the Tuesday meetings held there.

In 1875, Mallarmé also published his translation of Poe's The Raven, with pictures by Manet. In 1876, he published L'Après-midi d'un faune in a small and costly edition, again with pictures by Manet. Manet painted Mallarmé's portrait in the same year.[27]

Mallarmé did not become rich from these books. Many editions were small and expensive. They reached artists and collectors more easily than ordinary readers. However, they helped to create a new kind of book in which the paper, printed letters, pictures, and poem formed one complete work of art.[27]

Family loss and the Mardis

[change | change source]

Anatole became ill and died in 1879, at the age of eight. Mallarmé began writing notes for a work about his son. These notes are known as Pour un tombeau d'Anatole (For Anatole's Tomb). He never turned them into a finished book.[33]

The notes are broken, painful, and often very direct. They show a father trying to think about death without changing his grief into an easy religious answer.[33]

A man seated in a room with a framed picture behind him
Mallarmé in his apartment on the rue de Rome, about 1894. A pastel by Manet hangs behind him.

Around 1880, the Tuesday evening meetings at the apartment in rue de Rome became regular. They were called the Mardis, from the French word for Tuesday. Visitors came without much formal planning.

Mallarmé often stood near the fireplace, smoked, and spoke in a quiet voice. His writing could be difficult, but people often found his speech clear, graceful, and amusing. His movements and tone of voice helped listeners understand ideas that seemed more difficult on the printed page.[34]

The group changed over time. It included older friends such as Paul Verlaine, Villiers de l'Isle-Adam, and Joris-Karl Huysmans. Younger visitors included Gide, Valéry, Claudel, Henri de Régnier, and Pierre Louÿs. Writers and artists from other countries also came.[1]

The meetings brought together several generations and several kinds of art. Mallarmé became known as le Maître, or the Master. However, he did not lead a school with fixed rules. He encouraged different writers to find their own style and form.[35]

Cover of a small book
The 1884 edition of Verlaine's Les Poètes maudits, which included his study of Mallarmé

In 1883, the magazine Lutèce began publishing Verlaine's studies of the writers whom he called Les Poètes maudits (The Accursed Poets). His study of Mallarmé was part of this series. Verlaine collected the first studies in a book in 1884. This helped to make Mallarmé better known.[36]

Manet died in 1883, and his death affected Mallarmé deeply. During the 1880s, younger Symbolist writers increasingly saw Mallarmé as a leading poet. His reputation grew even though much of his work remained unpublished, unfinished, or available only in rare editions.[37]

Last years

[change | change source]

Mallarmé stopped teaching at the end of 1893, after about thirty years of work. In 1894, he gave the lecture La Musique et les Lettres (Music and Letters) in England. He spoke at Oxford and Cambridge. The text was published in 1895. The lecture brought together many of his later ideas about poetry, music, nature, society, and books.[38]

Debussy's Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune was first performed in 1894. At first, Mallarmé was uncertain about a musical work based on his poem. He later accepted it warmly. Debussy did not simply retell the poem's story. He created a new musical movement from its mood, pauses, desire, and uncertain dream.[39]

Group photograph of several people outdoors
Mallarmé at Valvins in 1896, with his wife Maria, his daughter Geneviève, and Paule and Jeannie Gobillard

After Verlaine died in 1896, a vote among writers named Mallarmé the new Prince of Poets. The title was not official, but it showed his high position in French literary life.

In 1897, Mallarmé published Divagations, a carefully ordered book of prose. In the same year, the magazine Cosmopolis published Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard. The magazine could not follow all of Mallarmé's plans for the size of the letters and the design of the pages, but the main visual idea was already clear.[40]

Mallarmé continued to work on Hérodiade, The Book, and other plans. On 8 September 1898, he suffered a serious attack in his throat at Valvins.

In a final note to his wife Maria and his daughter Geneviève, he clearly asked them to burn the large number of unfinished notes that he was leaving behind. He wrote that only he could have used them and that they were not a literary inheritance.[41]

A gravestone in a small cemetery
Mallarmé's grave in the cemetery at Samoreau

He died the next day, on 9 September, and was buried at Samoreau, near Valvins. His family did not destroy all his papers. Important notes survived, although no complete version of The Book has ever been found.[42]

Poetry and ideas

[change | change source]

Poetry as work

[change | change source]

Mallarmé did not accept the simple idea that a poet only waits for inspiration. Feelings were important to him, but they were only the beginning. A poem needed long and careful work. He often changed the same poem over many years. He changed single words, punctuation, the order of lines, and even the place of a poem inside a book. Several of his main works exist in both early and later forms.[43]

This method came partly from Poe. Poe had described the writing of a poem as a planned process. Mallarmé did not copy Poe's method in a mechanical way. He joined careful planning with uncertainty. The poet can choose words and forms, but the work may also create relations that the poet did not fully plan. Writing therefore takes place between control and chance.[44]

Claude Abastado describes this double movement as an important part of Mallarmé's theory of creation. The poet is both a careful worker and a performer on a stage. He knows that art uses methods, masks, and effects. At the same time, he wants the finished work to seem free from the hard work that created it. Images of the actor, clown, and juggler appear many times in Mallarmé's writing.[45]

Mallarmé worked slowly, but this was not only because he was afraid of failure. He believed that every new work should test a new part of language. He did not want to repeat an easy success. This helps to explain why he wrote only a small number of poems, although they are very different from one another. His works include traditional sonnets, dramatic speeches, prose poems, short poems written in memory of the dead, critical prose, and a large visual poem.[46]

Naming and suggesting

[change | change source]

In ordinary speech, a person usually names something in order to give information. Mallarmé described much ordinary writing as a kind of universal reporting. A newspaper report, a school lesson, and a practical message may all use words as clear signs. Poetry has a different purpose. It does not only carry a fact from one person to another.[47]

Mallarmé often said that poetry should suggest. To suggest means to lead the mind towards something without giving it completely and at once. A poem may begin with a flower, a fan, a window, a swan, or a star. The object does not remain only a simple object. Its links with other words slowly create a larger idea. The reader takes part in creating this idea.[48]

This does not mean that Mallarmé wanted writing to be unclear without purpose. His best poems are very exact in their sound and structure. They are difficult because they hold many relations together. A direct statement closes many possible paths. Suggestion keeps several paths open.[49]

The flower is a useful example. A real flower has a colour, a smell, and a place. The word flower has no petals. However, it can bring many flowers into the mind, including flowers that are not present. Mallarmé valued this power of absence. A poem can make an ideal flower appear through language without copying one particular plant in a garden.[50]

The word as a meeting place

[change | change source]

For Mallarmé, a word is a meeting place. Its dictionary meaning is only one part of it. The poet also uses its sound, its older meanings, its place in a sentence, its links with nearby words, and its visual form on the page. One word may bring several images into the mind at the same time.[51]

French words often have several possible sounds and meanings. Mallarmé used these differences with great care. He liked sounds that almost repeat one another, hidden likenesses, and words that seem to answer each other. He also used rhyme as a way of thinking. Two rhyming words do not only sound alike. Their similar sound may make the reader compare their meanings.[52]

Jean Royère defended this kind of writing against people who said that it was only dark or secret. For Royère, Mallarmé made poetry think through rhythm, images, and relations between words rather than through the clear steps of an argument. A poem is not a damaged form of normal prose. It is a different use of language.[53]

Mallarmé sometimes chose a rare word because it brought several meanings together. At other times, he placed ordinary words in an unusual order. When reading his poems, a difficult word should not always be replaced by an easier one. Its exact strangeness may be part of the poem. In an article about Mallarmé, however, rare words should be clearly explained.[54]

Syntax and ellipsis

[change | change source]

Syntax is the order in which words form a sentence. Mallarmé often changes normal French syntax. He may place an important verb near the end of a sentence. He may separate a noun from the words that describe it. He may also leave out a word that the reader must add in the mind. This leaving out is called ellipsis.[55]

These methods make the reader move more slowly. They also change the order in which an idea appears. A normal sentence may first say who acts, then what the person does, and finally what the action affects. A sentence by Mallarmé may first present a light, a sound, or a movement. The person or object may appear only later. The reader first receives an effect and then has to search for its cause.[56]

His punctuation is also active. A dash may open another possible meaning. Brackets may place one thought inside another. A colon may turn an image into an explanation or turn an explanation into another image. In Un coup de dés, the empty paper can do the work that punctuation normally does in a paragraph.[57]

This kind of syntax is one reason why Mallarmé is difficult to translate. An English translation can make the grammar clear, but it may then remove the uncertainty found in the French. A translation that follows the French word order may keep more of the poem's movement, but it may sound strange in English. The translators of Guy Michaud's study chose to keep many of these planned uncertainties instead of turning the poems into simple explanations.[58]

The poet and the speaking voice

[change | change source]

Romantic poetry often presents a strong personal speaker. Mallarmé used personal feelings, but he wanted the writer's ordinary self to move away from the centre of the poem. He spoke about the poet disappearing as a person from the work. This idea is often called poetic impersonality.[59]

Impersonality does not mean that the poems have no emotion. For Anatole's Tomb came from a private loss. Brise marine came from a wish to escape a dull life. The swan sonnet gives a powerful image of failure. However, the poems turn these private feelings into forms that are not limited to one person's life.[60]

The speaking voice may be a faun, a princess, a dead poet, a clown, a swan, a priest, or an unnamed watcher. These figures work like masks. A mask hides one face, but it also makes another form visible. Wallace Fowlie therefore studies Mallarmé through several poetic masks, including the clown, the swan, and the hero.[60]

The poem itself may also seem to speak. Words answer other words through sound and form. In this sense, the poet does not disappear completely. He gives up direct control so that a larger order of words can appear.[59]

The Ideal and Nothingness

[change | change source]

Mallarmé often used the word Ideal. In his writing, it does not simply mean a perfect thing that a person would like to have. It may mean an unseen form or relation that art makes present. A group of real flowers dies. The poetic idea of the flower is not one physical plant. It is created through all the relations that the poem gives to the word.[61]

The Ideal has a difficult relation with the real world. The poet may desire pure beauty and reject daily life. This desire may become a trap. In L'Azur, the blue sky first appears as a sign of the Ideal. Later, it becomes an unbearable force that follows the poet. In the swan sonnet, the bird remembers a flight that it cannot make. Its pure white body is trapped in frozen water.[62]

Nothingness is the other side of the Ideal. If a poem removes the solid object, what remains? Mallarmé sometimes answers that an idea, a relation, a sound, or a blank remains. At other times, Nothingness is frightening. It may mean the loss of God, the fear that language has no final support, or the possibility that the work will never be finished.[63]

Guy Michaud presents Mallarmé's world as a web. Every part receives meaning through its links with the other parts. The web has no single solid centre. This model helps to explain why the Ideal and Nothingness are not simple opposites. Removing a fixed object may open a new field of relations.[24]

Fiction, truth, and the as if

[change | change source]

Mallarmé did not believe that art gives scientific facts. Art creates a fiction. A fiction is not only a lie. It is a created form through which people can see relations that ordinary life hides.[64]

His later works often use an as if movement. A poem may present a shipwreck as if it had happened, a constellation as if it were forming, or a public ceremony as if it could join a crowd together. The reader knows that the scene is made from words. Even so, the reader enters it for a time.[64]

This double knowledge is central to Mallarmé's art. Art needs belief, but not blind belief. A theatre audience knows that the stage is not ordinary life. However, the shared act may still change the way the audience sees life. Paula Gilbert Lewis argues that Mallarmé's art depends on this free participation by the public. The work cannot force belief. Its power begins when readers or viewers agree to enter the fiction.[65]

Chance and the act

[change | change source]

Chance is one of Mallarmé's main subjects. A word enters a language through history. A life begins in one family rather than another. A throw of dice produces one number from many possible numbers. The poet wants to create a necessary form from material that includes chance.[3]

Igitur presents a young man who tries to end the power of chance through one final act. The act does not bring a simple victory. Many years later, Un coup de dés returns to the same problem. Its title says that one throw of dice will never abolish chance. However, the throw still matters. It makes one form appear for a moment, even though it cannot remove all the other possibilities.[3]

This is also an image of the poem. The writer chooses one word, one line, and one form for the page. Other choices remain possible. The finished poem is therefore both necessary and fragile. It is a real act inside a world of chance.[3]

Mary Lewis Shaw understands this relation as a performance. The act has meaning because it happens, fails, and leaves a sign. The printed work records a movement, but it also asks the reader to perform the poem again with the eyes and the voice.[3]

The Book

[change | change source]

For about thirty years, Mallarmé spoke and wrote about a great work called Le Livre, or The Book. He did not mean an ordinary single volume. The project changed over time. It was to bring together poetry, numbers, the order of pages, spoken reading, movement, and a public ceremony.[66]

The notes for The Book include plans for numbers of pages, groups of readers, changes of place, and repeated performances. Some notes imagine a person who reads and arranges the work before a small public. The order of the pages could change. One reading would be only one part of a larger group of possible readings.[66]

The project has often been called impossible. Mallarmé never completed it. It should not be understood as a lost perfect book that once existed fully in his mind. The surviving notes are experiments. They show him testing how a book could become an event.[66]

Mary Lewis Shaw sees in these plans a movement from art towards ritual. Reading would no longer remain a private act performed by one person. It would become a shared performance. The poet would act less like a famous writer and more like a person leading a ceremony.[67]

The Book also answers Mallarmé's concern with society. Modern life separates people into workers, buyers, readers, and watchers. A true poetic ceremony might allow a group to see itself as a whole. This hope exists beside another fact: Mallarmé's real books often reached only a small and educated public. The tension between the small group and a public open to everyone never fully disappears.[68]

A world of repeated images

[change | change source]

Jean-Pierre Richard studied Mallarmé's poetry as an imagined world made from images, movements, materials, and shapes that return again and again. The same images appear in different works, but their meanings change each time. Sky, glass, water, ice, hair, jewels, flowers, fans, wings, paper, and stars form a connected network. The reader should not give each image one fixed meaning. Its meaning comes from its place in the whole poem.[69]

Sky, blue, and height

[change | change source]

The blue sky often represents height, purity, and a world beyond ordinary life. It can draw the poet upwards. However, it can also become cruel. In L'Azur, the speaker tries to escape from the blue sky by hiding in work, smoke, and ordinary things. The sky returns as a repeated cry. The Ideal has become a power that judges the poet.[70]

Height does not therefore always mean freedom. A high window may open towards another life, but it may also separate a sick person from the world. A tower may give a wide view, but it may also leave the writer alone. Mallarmé's poetry often places desire between a clear space above and a heavy room below.[70]

Windows, ships, and escape

[change | change source]

A window forms a border. A person can look through it without passing through it. In Les Fenêtres, a sick man turns away from the hospital room and looks towards the light outside. The glass promises escape, but it also keeps him inside.[70]

Ships and the sea give this desire a more active form. Brise marine begins with the feeling that the body and books have become tiring. The speaker dreams of leaving. The sea is open, dangerous, and free. However, the poem itself remains on the page. The journey takes place through language.[70]

A ship may later become an image of failure. In Un coup de dés, a shipwreck spreads across a great sea. The master may hold dice in his hand, but the storm and chance surround him. Escape, danger, and the act of writing come together.[70]

Flowers and the bouquet

[change | change source]

Flowers have a long history in lyric poetry. Mallarmé uses them as natural objects, gifts, signs of women, and images of poetic language. A flower can be cut from its root and placed in a bouquet. In the same way, the poet takes words from ordinary speech and places them in a new order.[70]

The bouquet brings both loss and gain. The real plant is no longer present. In its place, the poem gives a group of relations. Mallarmé's famous idea of a flower that is absent from every real bouquet expresses this movement. Poetry does not destroy the world. It changes the way the world becomes present.[70]

Hair, cloth, and the fan

[change | change source]

Hair in Mallarmé's poetry can form a rich inner space. It moves like water, smoke, cloth, or music. It may hide a face or lead towards a secret centre. Richard reads hair, woods, grass, and other thick natural forms as spaces that both stop and invite movement.[71]

Cloth appears as flags, curtains, dresses, and sails. It can cover a body, catch the air, or show a public sign. The fan is a small but important object. It opens and closes. It moves the air. Its folds are like the folds of a book.

Mallarmé wrote short poems on real fans for women whom he knew. The fan became at the same time a gift, a page, a wing, and an image of desire.[70]

The swan, wings, and ice

[change | change source]

The swan is one of Mallarmé's best-known images. In the sonnet usually called Le Cygne, a swan is trapped in ice. It remembers that it should have flown away before winter. Its white body almost becomes part of the white frozen world.[72]

The swan may represent the poet who desires a pure song but cannot complete it. It may also represent the poem itself: beautiful, silent, fixed, and trapped in its own purity. The image is powerful because it does not lead to only one lesson.[72]

In other poems, wings suggest flight, angels, birds, fans, and pages. They promise freedom. However, they may also be folded, broken, or only imagined. Mallarmé keeps the movement between rising and falling active.[72]

Night, lamps, and stars

[change | change source]

Mallarmé wrote much of his poetry late at night after his teaching work. The lamp was therefore a real object in his daily life. It also creates a small circle of light inside the darkness. The page appears under this light.[73]

Night may represent fear, death, or silence. It may also be a space where a new form becomes visible. Igitur takes place at midnight. Its candles, clock, old room, and family shadows turn thought into an action on a stage.

Fowlie calls this part of Mallarmé's work a metaphysics of night. Night becomes a way to think about existence, absence, and the poet's act.[73]

Stars are points of light separated by darkness. The mind joins them together into a constellation. This is close to Mallarmé's idea of reading. Words are separate marks, and the reader creates relations between them across the white space.

At the end of Un coup de dés, the possible constellation does not remove chance. It gives chance a temporary form.[74]

Paper, folds, and white space

[change | change source]

Paper is not only an empty support in Mallarmé's work. Its whiteness is active. A printed word cuts into it. An empty space may separate, delay, or connect groups of words. A folded sheet forms pages, but it also hides part of the text until the reader turns it.[70]

Mallarmé thought carefully about the physical form of a book. He cared about margins, printed letters, the quality of the paper, and the order of the pages. A closed book keeps a possible world hidden. An open book reveals that world little by little. The fold makes reading an action that takes place through time.[70]

In Un coup de dés, white space becomes part of the poem's rhythm. It may suggest silence, sea, sky, distance, or the space between thoughts. It does not have one fixed meaning. It gives the words room to form groups and movements.[70]

Main works

[change | change source]

Mallarmé published much less than many other major poets. He revised his work slowly, left several large projects unfinished, and often published in small magazines or rare books. However, the small amount of published work can give a false idea of its importance. The same poem may exist in several versions, and a short text may contain ideas developed over many years. His letters, essays, translations, fashion writing, and notes are also important parts of his work.[75]

One useful way to study his works is to follow their dates and their different forms. His early lyric poems begin with models from Romantic and Parnassian poetry. His dramatic poems test different voices and forms of theatre. His prose poems bring the poet into the modern street, fair, concert hall, and newspaper world. His later sonnets make language very dense. Finally, Un coup de dés changes the form of the printed page itself.[76]

Early poems

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's early poems include Le Guignon (Bad Luck), Apparition, Les Fenêtres, L'Azur, Brise marine, and Les Fleurs. Most of them were written during the 1860s. They use regular metre, rhyme, and the rich images of French lyric poetry. They also introduce the main conflicts that remained in Mallarmé's work: the wish to escape ordinary life, the fear of failing as an artist, the attraction of beauty, and the knowledge that beauty can be cold or impossible to reach.[77]

Le Guignon presents poets as unlucky travellers. Some fail before they reach their goal. Others become public entertainers or failed figures. The poem uses the old idea of the rejected poet, but it does not present failure as simply noble. Failure can also be comic, ugly, and physical.[77]

Apparition is more gentle and graceful. A memory of a young woman becomes a scene filled with moonlight, flowers, and a fairy-like figure. The poem still uses a clear personal voice. However, the woman is already less important than the changing world of light, smell, colour, and memory around her.[78]

Les Fenêtres presents a sick man in a hospital. He turns away from the room and looks at the sky through a window. At first, the poem seems to place the spirit against the body. Its ending is less clear. The speaker dreams of breaking the glass and flying away, but he also fears falling back into ordinary life. The window gives him a view of freedom, but not a real way out.[79]

L'Azur turns the blue sky into an enemy. The poet tries to hide from it beneath smoke, heavy curtains, and daily work. However, the blue sky returns in his mind and in the poem's final repeated cry. The poem is important because the Ideal is not shown as a peaceful heaven. It becomes a demand that the poet cannot satisfy.[80]

Brise marine begins with one of Mallarmé's clearest statements: the body is sad, and the speaker has read all the books. He dreams of leaving by ship. The sea wind is both real and literary. It promises another place, but the poem never says that the journey truly begins. The act of leaving takes place through verse.[81]

In these poems, Mallarmé still uses many subjects also found in Baudelaire and the Parnassian poets. His own method appears in the importance given to every image. Sky, window, book, sail, flower, and wing are not only decorations. Each image takes part in a group of opposite movements: rising and falling, opening and closing, purity and the failure to create, freedom and being held back.[82]

Hérodiade

[change | change source]

Mallarmé worked on Hérodiade during most of his adult life. He began it in 1864 and was still changing it shortly before his death. The work takes its name from Herodias, but Mallarmé changed the old story. His Hérodiade is a young princess who refuses ordinary love and protects a cold beauty that needs nothing outside itself.

The finished and unfinished parts include an opening scene, a long conversation between Hérodiade and her nurse, a song by John the Baptist, and later plans for a larger mystery play.[83]

The best-known part is the Scène, the conversation between Hérodiade and the nurse. The nurse wants to touch or care for the young woman. Hérodiade refuses. She wants to remain complete in herself. Mirrors, jewels, metal, hair, perfume, cold, and dawn create a closed world around her.[83]

Several critics have understood Hérodiade as a figure for pure poetry. Fowlie and Block also explain why this idea is not simple. Hérodiade represents both the beauty and the danger of artistic separation. She protects herself from time, touch, birth, and change. However, this protection can become a form of death. Her purity gives her power, but it prevents her from forming a relation with another person.[83]

The dramatic form is important. Hérodiade does not explain her ideas in an essay. Her thoughts appear through her voice, movements, surroundings, and conflict with the nurse. Haskell M. Block argues that Mallarmé's dramatic writing helped later Symbolist theatre move away from ordinary action and towards inner states, repeated images, and speech that sounds like a ceremony.[84]

The work also changed as Mallarmé himself changed. The early parts belong to his crisis of the 1860s. The later plans give a larger place to John the Baptist, death, sacrifice, and possible rebirth. Because Mallarmé never completed the work, readers should not force all its parts into one final system. Its long history shows several stages in the development of his art.[85]

L'Après-midi d'un faune

[change | change source]

L'Après-midi d'un faune is a dramatic monologue. Its speaker is a faun, a creature from ancient myth that is half human and half goat. He wakes at noon and tries to remember whether he met two nymphs or only dreamed about them. He plays a flute, tells parts of the event again, changes his story, imagines new scenes, and finally returns to sleep.[86]

The poem began in 1865 as a work for the theatre. Mallarmé first called it Le Faune, interlude héroïque, and later Monologue d'un faune. Theatre managers refused its early forms. Mallarmé continued revising the poem and published its best-known version in 1876.[87]

A dancer in a faun costume
Vaslav Nijinsky as the faun in the 1912 ballet, photographed by Adolf de Meyer

The action is uncertain from the first line. The faun says that he wants to keep the nymphs alive. It is not clear whether he means alive in memory, in song, or in desire. His senses give him signs, but these signs do not prove that the event happened. A white shape may be a woman's body, light on plants, or foam. A sound may be a cry, a bird, or music.

The poem does not ask the reader to discover one correct version of the event. Its subject is the creation of an imagined event from incomplete signs.[86]

The faun is both a lover and an artist. His flute changes breath into music. His speech changes desire into poetry. He often changes failure into a new performance. When he cannot hold the nymphs, he holds their possible image. When his memory grows weak, language begins again.[86]

The poem also tests the classical French alexandrine. Its lines keep the traditional twelve syllables, but they use pauses, questions, broken phrases, and changes of voice. The result is both formal and free. Wallace Fowlie describes the poem as one of Mallarmé's richest studies of the relation between sexual desire, dreams, and poetic creation.[86]

Manet made woodcut pictures for the first book edition of The Afternoon of a Faun

Debussy's orchestral Prélude helped to make the poem known outside France. Nijinsky's ballet of 1912 gave the faun a new physical form. These later works are not simple translations of Mallarmé's poem. Each one chooses part of its rhythm, desire, or uncertainty and creates a new work in another art form.[86]

Igitur, ou la Folie d'Elbehnon is an unfinished prose work written mainly between 1869 and 1871. The Latin word igitur means "therefore". The name already sounds like the final step of an argument.

The subtitle means Igitur, or the Madness of Elbehnon. The name "Elbehnon" is close to the Hebrew word for "son" and also contains sounds connected with "nothing" in French. Mallarmé used names as groups of suggestions rather than as simple labels.[88]

The work takes place at midnight in an old family house. Igitur goes down stairs and enters a room containing books, candles, curtains, a clock, and the shadows of his ancestors. He prepares to perform an act. He may drink from a small bottle and throw dice. The surviving versions do not give one fixed order or one final ending.[88]

Igitur is often read as an answer to Mallarmé's crisis of Nothingness. The young hero tries to prove that a free action can defeat chance. However, the plan defeats itself. If the action is already required by the family and by logic, then it is not completely free. If the dice truly depend on chance, their result cannot prove that anything was necessary.[88]

The work is also a theatre of thought. Ideas become objects and movements. Midnight is both a time and an abstract point of zero. The stairs give physical form to a movement downwards. The clock divides time. The candles make things appear and disappear. The open and closed book becomes part of the action.[88]

Mallarmé read part of Igitur to friends, but they did not understand it. He did not publish the work. The failure of this first audience may have helped him change both his prose style and his ideas about communication with the public.[89]

Later readers have connected Igitur with Hamlet. Both are young men held by a dead family order. Both think so much about action that action becomes difficult. Block shows that Hamlet helped Mallarmé imagine a modern hero whose main drama takes place in the mind.[88]

The prose poems

[change | change source]

Mallarmé wrote prose poems from the 1860s to the 1890s. He later placed many of them together in Divagations. They include Le Phénomène futur, Plainte d'automne, Frisson d'hiver, Le Démon de l'analogie, Pauvre enfant pâle, La Pipe, Un spectacle interrompu, Réminiscence, La Déclaration foraine, La Gloire, and Conflit.[90]

These works should not be understood as verse poems with the line breaks removed. Prose gives Mallarmé other kinds of movement. A sentence can move through several parts, hide its main verb, and change its subject. The narrator can move between reporting, memory, dream, argument, and irony.[90]

The prose poems also include parts of modern life that appear less often in his lyric poetry. They present streets, newspapers, fairs, travelling shows, poor singers, railway journeys, workers, crowds, shop windows, and public entertainment. The poet does not simply leave society for a pure inner world. He meets society at its edges.[91]

Le Phénomène futur presents a travelling show. A man displays a beautiful woman to the people of the future. The crowd has become weak and ugly. The woman appears as the last image of an earlier natural world.

The prose poem may be read as a proud defence of beauty, but it is also troubling. Beauty has become a product displayed in a booth, and the poet's own art may be in the same position.[91]

Le Démon de l'analogie begins when a strange sentence forms in the speaker's mind. Its sounds repeat without any clear cause. He walks through the city, sees musical instruments in a shop, and feels that language is acting inside him.

The "demon" is not an ordinary supernatural being. It is the power through which sounds, words, memories, and objects call to one another.[92]

Pauvre enfant pâle speaks to a pale child who sings in the street. The speaker feels pity, fear, and dislike at the same time. The child's song enters the public space but is almost lost in the noise of the city. Ursula Franklin shows how the poem brings together sound, differences between social groups, guilt, innocence, and the danger of violence.[93]

Un spectacle interrompu tells the story of a bear on a stage that seems to recognise the performer standing before it. The expected entertainment stops for a moment. The poet sees a deep relation where newspaper writers would see only a strange event.

The work contrasts poetic vision with ordinary reporting, but it also questions the poet's wish to claim a special way of seeing.[94]

La Déclaration foraine presents a poet and a woman at a country fair. The poet reads a sonnet before a public that may not understand it. The act is both proud and comic. High poetry enters a cheap public place. It does not remain pure, but it receives a body, a voice, and an audience.[91]

Conflit takes place near Valvins. Railway workers rest and drink near the poet's country house. Their work, tired bodies, songs, and sleep enter the text. At first, the poet sees them as an invasion. He then imagines a relation between their shared life and his own act of writing.

The prose poem does not solve the social conflict, but it refuses to keep poetry and physical work completely separate.[95]

Franklin reads the prose poems as a carefully ordered collection rather than as a group of unrelated works. Their order shows changes in the poet's voice and in his relations with the city, nature, the public, and art.[90] Robert Greer Cohn also says that every prose poem works through a close network of sounds, word roots, images, and hidden structural relations.[96]

Sonnets and short poems

[change | change source]

Mallarmé became a master of the sonnet. A sonnet has only fourteen lines, but its fixed form allowed him to create very dense relations. He used the change between the first eight and final six lines, the rhyme pattern, and repeated sounds as parts of thought.[97]

Printed title page of a book of poems
Title page of Poésies, 1887

Le vierge, le vivace et le bel aujourd'hui, often called the swan sonnet, presents a swan trapped in frozen water. Past failure, present ice, and the memory of flight come together in one image. The grammar delays the subject and changes the meaning of each adjective. The poem is difficult, but its physical scene remains powerful.[98]

Ses purs ongles très haut dédiant leur onyx, sometimes called the "sonnet in -yx", takes place in an empty room at night. A lamp, a mirror, a shell, a window, and stars form an almost abstract interior. Several of the rhyming words are rare.

The people and objects that are absent become as important as those that are named. The final constellation seems to appear in the mirror or the window, but its exact position remains uncertain.[99]

Prose (pour des Esseintes) is not written in prose. It is a verse poem written for the fictional character Jean des Esseintes from Huysmans's novel À rebours. The title turns the word "prose" into part of a word game. The poem imagines an island, flowers, learning, and a strange journey. Its repeated sounds and learned words create a ceremonial movement.[100]

Mallarmé also wrote poems in memory of dead writers and artists. The poems for Poe, Baudelaire, and Verlaine are usually called tombeaux. A tombeau is both a tomb and a poetic form. His poem for Wagner has the different title Hommage (Homage).

These poems do not simply tell the story of a person's life. They try to make the dead artist present through the special materials of art.[101]

Le Tombeau d'Edgar Poe begins with the idea that death changes the poet into his true self. The poem also attacks the hostile public that did not understand Poe. Its language is proud and hard. The tomb becomes a solid block placed against ordinary speech.[102]

In Le Tombeau de Charles Baudelaire, city objects, gas light, poison, and shadow recall Baudelaire's world without giving a simple portrait. The memorial is created from changed signs taken from the earlier poet's work.[103]

These short poems show why Mallarmé cannot be reduced to one theory. Some sonnets are almost private gifts. Some are public memorials. Some are comic. Others study the room, the body, or the book. Their common quality is not one subject but an extreme care for relations.[104]

Pour un tombeau d'Anatole

[change | change source]
Photograph of a young boy
Anatole Mallarmé, who died in 1879 at the age of eight

After his son Anatole died in 1879, Mallarmé wrote many notes for a possible tomb poem. He did not arrange them for publication during his lifetime. The notes move between direct speech to the child, memory, family scenes, philosophy, anger, and broken prayer.[33]

They are important because they place Mallarmé's abstract language beside direct grief. He tries to understand whether a work of art can keep a dead child present. At the same time, he knows that language cannot replace the child's body. The father wishes to give his son a future inside the work, but the project repeatedly stops.[33]

The notes should not be read as a finished poem. Their broken form records the limits of artistic form when faced with grief. They also question the idea that Mallarmé always removed the personal self from poetry. Here, the father, mother, daughter, room, illness, and lost child remain painfully clear and particular.[33]

Divagations

[change | change source]

Divagations, published in 1897, is Mallarmé's main collection of prose. Its title may mean wanderings or movements away from a straight path. The book is carefully organised even though it often appears free and written for particular occasions.[90]

It contains prose poems, portraits of writers, articles about theatre and dance, notes about books, essays on Wagner, discussions of religion and society, and short works of criticism. Some texts had first appeared many years earlier. Mallarmé revised and arranged them so that they answered one another.[90]

The prose is often more difficult than the poetry. Sentences may begin with a less important idea, delay the main statement, and bring together several levels of meaning. This is not careless writing. The sentence often performs the movement that it describes. An essay on dance may seem to turn and balance. A paragraph about the book may fold around a central word.[105]

Crayonné au théâtre (Sketches at the Theatre) studies mime, dance, opera, and public performance. Ballets describes the dancer as a moving sign who writes with her body. Richard Wagner: rêverie d'un poète français praises Wagner's power but also protects poetry from being ruled by music. Le Livre, instrument spirituel presents the book as a spiritual instrument made through folds, printed letters, pages, and reading.[67]

Divagations is therefore not only a book that explains Mallarmé's ideas. His criticism is itself literary. It does not stand outside the poems and change them into simple rules. It continues their experiments in prose.[106]

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard

[change | change source]

Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard is Mallarmé's most radical printed work. It first appeared in the magazine Cosmopolis in 1897. A book edition that followed his plans more closely appeared after his death in 1914.[107]

A page from the 1914 book edition of Un coup de dés

The poem spreads across a series of pairs of pages. Words appear in several different sizes. Some groups of words move diagonally or stand far apart. Large areas of white paper separate the phrases.

The reader may follow the main sentence printed in the largest letters, read each smaller branch, or move between them. No single way of reading removes all uncertainty.[3]

The main scene is a shipwreck. A Master rises above the sea and holds dice. He may throw them or may hesitate. A child-like shadow, a feather, a siren, foam, and a possible constellation appear. The scene is about the universe, but it is also an image of writing and reading.[3]

The title gives the central statement: a throw of the dice never removes chance. A planned action cannot remove the field of chance in which it happens. However, this does not make the action useless. The throw produces one number, pattern, or event. The poem creates one constellation of words without saying that it is the only possible order.[3]

The design of the pages is part of this idea. Traditional printing often hides the page by presenting one even block of text. Mallarmé makes the page itself visible. The blank paper is the field in which each act of language appears. Different sizes of print suggest changes in volume and distance. The pair of pages becomes a stage or a musical score.[3]

The poem also brings different arts together while keeping them separate. It may look like a musical score, but it is not music. It may look like a picture, but it is made from words that can be read. It suggests drama, but it has no ordinary actors. Shaw argues that this relation of likeness and difference between literature and performance is central to the poem.[3]

An autograph plan for the page arrangement of Un coup de dés

Many readers have described Un coup de dés as an early work of modern visual or concrete poetry. Mary Lewis Shaw places it within a longer history of performance and printed form. Poems with visual shapes had existed before, and Mallarmé still depended on grammar, metre, and literary tradition.

His special achievement was to make typography, spacing, and the order of pages equal parts of an important modern poem. The work influenced later poets, artists, and book designers because it showed that reading also means seeing and moving through time.[108]

Mallarmé and the other arts

[change | change source]

Mallarmé did not believe that the different arts should lose their own qualities. Painting works with visible colour and surfaces. Music works with organised sound. Dance uses the moving body. Poetry uses language. The arts can meet and influence one another, but each art must keep its own methods.[76]

This idea explains what may seem to be a contradiction. Mallarmé often used words and ideas taken from music, theatre, painting, and dance. However, he did not want poetry to become a weak copy of another art. Suzanne Bernard argues that his wish to "make music" with language did not mean that pleasant sounds were more important than thought. Sound mattered because it was one of the ways in which words created meaning through their relations with one another.[109]

Painting and the illustrated book

[change | change source]

Mallarmé supported the artists who later became known as the Impressionists. He defended Manet when much of the public and the press rejected his work. Mallarmé understood that modern painting did not need to hide its surface beneath a smooth copy of the visible world. A painting could openly show colour, brushwork, light, and the way the image was placed inside its frame. These could all become visible parts of the artistic act.[29]

His friendship with Manet led to several books on which they worked together. Manet made lithographs for Mallarmé's translation of Poe's The Raven. He also made woodcuts for The Afternoon of a Faun. The pictures do not explain the words line by line. Text and image stand beside one another and leave a space in which the reader can form connections.[29]

Mallarmé also knew Morisot, Renoir, Whistler, and Redon. He wrote less criticism about painting than some of his friends expected, but his essays and letters show that he paid close attention to visual art. Mary Lewis Shaw notes that his relation with painting was more direct than his often divided relation with music and theatre. He defended modern painting and worked with artists on the physical design of books.[106]

Lithograph of a shadowy head
One of Odilon Redon's lithographs for a planned edition of Un coup de dés. The edition was never published.

The illustrated book created a difficult problem. A picture may make one possible image too fixed and clear, while a poem may need its image to remain open. Mallarmé therefore preferred pictures that kept their own freedom and did not take the place of the reader's imagination.[110]

His interest in books included the paper, size, margins, printed letters, cover, and fold. A carefully made edition was not only an expensive object. It was a way of making the physical form of reading answer the form of the poem. This aim can be seen from the books made with Manet to Un coup de dés.[110]

Music was both a model and a rival for Mallarmé. It seemed able to move an audience without giving a plain report or explanation. It also created a strong shared experience in the concert hall. Mallarmé admired these powers.[111]

He went to the Sunday concerts led by Charles Lamoureux. According to his daughter, he sometimes said that he was going to vespers, an evening church service. The joke suggests that the modern concert had taken part of the place once held by religious ceremony.[112]

Wagner was the main example. Wagner's operas joined music, poetry, stage design, myth, and a theatre made especially for his works. Mallarmé admired the size of this project and the power of its public ceremony. However, he also believed that Wagner placed music above the other arts and depended too much on old national myths.[111]

Mallarmé wanted poetry to answer Wagner without copying him. Language could carry both ideas and sounds. A poem could suggest a whole world without placing actors, painted scenery, or a large orchestra before the public. In this sense, the small printed page could stand against the great opera house.[111]

His relation with Debussy was different. Debussy did not claim that his music could replace Mallarmé's poem. The Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune is an independent answer to it. Its opening flute, changing musical colours, weak pulse, and returning musical forms create a dream-like movement close to the poem's uncertain memory.[111]

Later composers used Mallarmé's poetry in different ways. Maurice Ravel set three poems to music in Trois poèmes de Stéphane Mallarmé. Pierre Boulez built Pli selon pli from several of Mallarmé's poems and from the image of one fold placed upon another. These works show that Mallarmé's poetry did not demand one particular kind of music. Its spaces and structures invited composers to create new works.[111]

Mallarmé wrote works for the theatre and wrote about theatre throughout his life. Hérodiade, The Afternoon of a Faun, and Igitur all began from dramatic ideas. He planned other works for the stage but did not complete them.[84]

He disliked much commercial and naturalistic theatre. Such theatre often filled the stage with furniture and asked actors to copy ordinary daily behaviour. Mallarmé believed that too much visible detail could reduce the inner work of the person watching. He preferred a stage made from voice, movement, light, and a small number of strong signs.[113]

This did not mean that he wanted theatre without bodies or without an audience. His ideal theatre was not only silent reading. He was interested in the actor, the reader, the crowd, and the moment when a work becomes present in a room. Haskell Block places these ideas close to the rise of Symbolist drama. Writers such as Maurice Maeterlinck later used little action, repeated words, waiting, and unseen powers in ways that were close to some of Mallarmé's aims.[114]

Mallarmé also valued forms of performance that were often treated as less important, such as mime, the circus, the fair, puppet shows, and parades. These forms showed how one movement or costume could carry meaning without a realistic explanation. His high idea of art could therefore meet popular entertainment in unexpected ways.[115]

Dance gave Mallarmé an example of a sign made without ordinary speech. In his essay Ballets, he describes the dancer as a figure who writes with her body. Her movements do not tell one fixed story. They may suggest a flower, bird, wave, woman, or idea without becoming only one of these things.[116]

A dancer holding out a large flowing dress
Loie Fuller in 1895. Mallarmé wrote about her dances with cloth and electric light.

He admired classical ballet, but he also responded to the new performances of Loie Fuller. Fuller used large pieces of cloth and coloured electric light to create changing forms like flowers, flames, and wings around her body. Her body remained present but was partly hidden. The performance changed real cloth into a field of moving forms.[116]

Mary Lewis Shaw and Paula Gilbert Lewis point to a limit in Mallarmé's writing about dance. He often turns the woman on stage into an abstract sign. As a result, the dancer's own work and personality may disappear. Even so, his essays remain important because they treat movement, costume, light, and the viewer's understanding as parts of a language of performance.[105]

Nijinsky's later ballet Afternoon of a Faun used the body in a different way. Its flat poses and strong side views were based on ancient Greek art. Its final sexual movement shocked some members of the audience. The ballet made the desire in Mallarmé's poem more visible and physical than it is in the printed monologue.[117]

Voice and public reading

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's works are often studied as texts read in silence, but the human voice was also important to him. He read poems and lectures aloud. People who heard him said that his tone, pauses, and movements made difficult ideas easier to understand. His voice gave stress and connections that the written syntax did not always make clear.[64]

The Mardis were also a form of spoken art. Mallarmé did not give ordinary university lectures. He spoke, answered questions, changed direction, and used humour. His authority came partly from his presence, but the meetings were also shared events. Visitors brought questions, poems, news, and experience from different arts.[64]

The plans for The Book turn public reading into a formal event. A person leading the reading would arrange the sheets and guide a small group through the work. The book would be both a physical object and a performance. Paula Gilbert Lewis sees this meeting between the person who explains the work and the audience as necessary to Mallarmé's hope that art could bring people together.[118]

Society and the public

[change | change source]

Mallarmé is often described as a poet in an ivory tower. There is some truth in the image. He defended demanding art and did not believe that a poem had to be easy for every first reader. He disliked mass journalism, advertising language, and the use of art as a simple product.[119]

The image is still incomplete. He was a salaried teacher, husband, father, magazine writer, translator, public lecturer, and host. His prose includes workers, crowds, fashion, elections, money, newspapers, and public shows. His main problem was not whether art should have a public. It was what kind of relation between art and public was possible.[120]

The small group and the unknown future public

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's actual audience was often small. Rare editions and difficult magazines reached few people. The Tuesday group was an educated artistic circle. This fact has led some readers to call his art aristocratic.[64]

He sometimes used aristocratic language himself. He spoke of an elite able to read. He also attacked the idea that a numerical majority automatically gives truth or value. Such statements belong to the anti-democratic side of some late nineteenth-century art.[64]

At other times, he imagined a much wider future. The poet's work might help a people recognise its own shared being in a festival. The true public would not be divided into buyers and sellers or into passive spectators. It would take part in the event.[64]

These two views do not fit easily together. Paula Gilbert Lewis calls Mallarmé's attitude toward social reality ambivalent, meaning that opposite feelings remain active. He can distrust the present crowd and still hope for a universal community. He can write for a few and imagine art for all.[121]

Journalism and ordinary language

[change | change source]

Mallarmé often opposed literature to what he called universal reporting. Reporting tells, teaches, names, and passes information. Such language is necessary. A train time, law, lesson, or news report should not hide its main point.[64]

Poetry has another task. It makes the reader experience relations that cannot be reduced to one piece of information. Mallarmé did not mean that every non-poetic text is worthless. His own fashion magazine proves that he could enjoy practical and public writing. His contrast was between different uses of language.[64]

Modern journalism also worried him because it made all events quickly exchangeable. A death, war, show, election, and scandal could become equal columns on one page. Poetry slowed reading and resisted this quick replacement. Its difficulty could act as a defence of attention.[64]

This defence has a cost. Difficult language can exclude readers who lack time, education, or access to books. Mallarmé knew part of this problem but did not solve it. His hope was that a better public ceremony would make demanding form shared rather than private.[64]

Work, money, and the writer

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's life depended on paid teaching. He often complained that school work took the hours needed for poetry. He also knew that the poet could not live outside economic life. Paper, printing, rooms, travel, and food all cost money.[122]

Some of his prose treats the artist as a worker. The poet selects, tests, cuts, and orders language. Inspiration matters, but it must pass through long labour. Claude Abastado describes Mallarmé's creation as an experience joined to a theory of construction. The poem comes from crisis and desire, but it is also made through conscious artifice.[122]

Conflit places this literary labour beside railway labour. The poet and workers do not do the same thing, and the text does not pretend that they do. It asks whether their different acts can enter one symbolic event.[122]

Paula Gilbert Lewis describes a related tension in Mallarmé's position. Fame, reviews, portraits, signatures, and rare editions all produce market value. Mallarmé sometimes wanted the personal author to disappear behind the work. Yet the name “Mallarmé” became a powerful cultural sign during his life. His practice kept both movements active.[122]

Religion, ritual, and secular art

[change | change source]

Mallarmé lost the simple Catholic belief of his childhood. He did not return to church teaching in a normal form. Religious words and structures remained central: mystery, mass, sacrifice, host, hymn, priest, feast, and resurrection.[123]

He thought that modern society had lost a shared ceremony. Religion had once joined architecture, music, story, dress, calendar, and crowd. Modern art was divided into separate works and markets. The Book or ideal theatre might create a new secular ritual. “Secular” here means not controlled by a church.[123]

This aim was not a plan for a new official religion with fixed beliefs. Mallarmé distrusted fixed dogma. The ceremony would show people their own power of imagination and relation. It would be true as fiction, not as a report of a supernatural fact.[123]

Mary Lewis Shaw therefore speaks of a passage from art to ritual. A text becomes an event in which reader, performer, space, and time take part. The ritual does not erase the work's artifice. It makes the shared “as if” visible.[123]

Language and poetic method

[change | change source]

Critics have developed several ways of describing Mallarmé's poetic method. These approaches do not give one final meaning, but they show that the poems are organised rather than random. They attend to scene, grammar, sound, several possible meanings, absence, page form, and revision.[76]

Scene and material setting

[change | change source]

One approach begins with the physical scene before moving to abstract meanings. It identifies the possible speaker, place, body, and objects. In the faun poem, a body wakes in heat, remembers nymphs, plays a flute, and lies down again. In Igitur, a young man moves through a room at midnight. In the swan sonnet, a bird is caught in ice.[70]

The scene may later become uncertain, but it gives the reader a first ground. Mallarmé's abstract thought usually remains attached to body, object, light, or movement.[70]

Sentence structure

[change | change source]

A Mallarmé sentence often separates subject, verb, and object. It may place several descriptive groups between them. First find the main grammatical frame. Then return the other words to it.[124]

This method is especially useful in the sonnets. It can also be used in Un coup de dés, where the largest type carries a main sentence across many pages. Smaller groups interrupt and expand it.[124]

Grammar alone does not settle the poem. A word may fit more than one part of the sentence. Still, finding the basic frame prevents difficulty from becoming pure confusion.[124]

Sound and oral reading

[change | change source]

Sound makes relations visible to the ear. Rhyme can link distant words. Repeated consonants can make a movement hard, soft, broken, or flowing. A pause can divide a sentence in two ways.[111]

Reading aloud also shows that Mallarmé's syntax has rhythm. Long suspension may be followed by a short release. A question may remain open. A repeated vowel may join images that grammar keeps apart.[111]

Critics such as Suzanne Bernard do not treat every sound as a secret code. Similar sounds form one kind of evidence beside grammar, image, and argument.[111]

Several meanings

[change | change source]

Some words have several ordinary meanings, while others gain new meanings from the poem. A “wing” may belong to a bird, fan, angel, ship, or page. Richard's study of Mallarmé's imagined world shows why several of these relations may remain active at the same time.[70]

Mallarmé's idea of suggestion depends on controlled plurality. “Plurality” means that more than one relation remains possible. The possibilities are not unlimited. They must answer the words, grammar, images, and form of the work.[70]

Negation and absence

[change | change source]

Words such as “not”, “no more”, “without”, “empty”, and “absent” have strong force in Mallarmé. The poem often gives an object by showing its removal. A room may be defined by who is not there. A flower may appear as an idea because no real flower is named.[125]

Absence is not the same as nothing at all. A missing person can organise a whole scene. White paper can direct the eye. Silence can frame a sound.[125]

Page layout

[change | change source]

Line endings and stanza shapes matter in all regular verse, and they have unusual force in Mallarmé. A sonnet rewritten as one paragraph would lose relations made by rhyme, line position, and the turn between its parts.[3]

For Un coup de dés, the two-page opening is the basic field. Look at type size, distance, direction, and blank before reading each phrase. Then test possible orders. The page is not an illustration added after the words. It is part of their syntax and rhythm.[3]

Revision and textual states

[change | change source]

Mallarmé revised for years. Earlier and later forms can show what problem he was trying to solve. The Afternoon of a Faun moved from a stage plan to a published monologue. Hérodiade grew from a scene into plans for a larger mystery. The prose poem Réminiscence transformed an earlier piece called L'Orphelin.[126]

Textual critics do not always treat the latest state as perfect and the early state as bad. Different states may have different aims. The history of revision is part of the work.[126]

Different critical methods

[change | change source]

Many critics have offered one key to Mallarmé: idealism, Nothingness, sexuality, religion, language, sound, biography, or a hidden system of symbols. Each can explain real parts of the work. None explains all of it.[127]

Robert Greer Cohn's close structural readings, Jean-Pierre Richard's study of the imagined world, Charles Chadwick's account of thought in the poems, and Guy Delfel's study of aesthetics often disagree in method. Their disagreement is useful. It shows that Mallarmé's writing supports several exact approaches rather than one loose impression.[127]

Critical debates

[change | change source]

Difficulty and intention

[change | change source]

Mallarmé did not try to make every sentence easy. He believed that direct naming could remove much of the pleasure of poetry. Suggestion required delay and participation. In this sense, part of the difficulty is intentional.[128]

He did not value confusion for its own sake. His poems are highly organised. Their difficulty comes from compressed grammar, rare words, several meanings, missing links, and the wish to make sound and page shape think with the sentence.[128]

The word “obscure” can therefore mislead. Some passages are truly hard to understand. Others are clear at the level of scene or feeling but cannot be reduced to one statement. A poem may be clear as an event and open as an idea.[128]

Jean Royère, an early defender, argued that Mallarmé's hermetic poetry required a new habit of reading. “Hermetic” means closed or hard to enter. The reader must work through relations rather than expect a ready message.[128]

Idealism and Nothingness

[change | change source]

An idealist gives ideas or mind a basic place in reality. Mallarmé often wrote about the Ideal, spirit, pure notion, and the world as it appears through the mind. This supports an idealist reading.[24]

He also wrote about Nothingness, absence, failure, and the fiction of language. The Ideal may be impossible. A beautiful form may reveal the emptiness behind old beliefs. This supports a more negative reading.[24]

The two sides are joined. Mallarmé's ideal does not stand securely above the world. It appears through acts made from fragile words and material paper. Nothingness can destroy false certainty, but it also clears a space for form.[24]

Guy Michaud describes Mallarmé's career as a search for a new poetry after the death of the old dream. Charles Chadwick follows the movement of thought inside individual poems rather than treating the philosophy as a separate system.[129][130]

Pure poetry and the material world

[change | change source]

“Pure poetry” is often used for poetry separated from story, politics, and ordinary statement. Mallarmé did seek an impersonal and highly made art. Some poems turn away from daily events.[70]

The work is not free from the world. It uses bodies, illness, desire, family death, school labour, fashion, streets, crowds, and machines. Its paper and printing are material. Even the pure swan is trapped in physical ice.[70]

Purity is often a problem inside the poem rather than the final answer. Hérodiade's purity is sterile. The swan's whiteness is a prison. The empty room may produce a constellation, but it may also record loss.[70]

Wallace Fowlie's study helped make symbols such as sky, void, closed book, swan, and hero central to English-language criticism. Jean-Pierre Richard then showed how these images form a changing sensory world rather than a list of fixed ideas.[131][132]

Unfinished work and failure

[change | change source]

Hérodiade, Igitur, the Anatole tomb, and The Book were not finished. Walzer and Michaud both give an important place to Mallarmé's fear of failure, and a planned work that was not completed can be described as a failure in that limited sense.[133]

Unfinished form can also be productive. It leaves visible the changing plan, the pressure of impossible aims, and the limits of one life. Later artists learned as much from the fragments and notes as from the finished poems.[133]

The surviving evidence does not support the claim that Mallarmé secretly completed one perfect Book that scholars have not found. Shaw describes changing plans, calculations, and fragments. The project exists as a field of work, not as a hidden normal volume.[133]

Pierre-Olivier Walzer presents the contrast between the modest daily man and the immense artistic ambition. Henri Mondor's detailed biography shows how long plans grew beside teaching, illness, family duty, friendship, and limited time.[134]

Solitude and literary society

[change | change source]

The young Mallarmé often described himself as lonely, ill, and cut off from the world. He needed long private work. The image of the isolated poet is therefore based on real experience.[135]

Two men in a room with a large mirror
Mallarmé (standing) with Pierre-Auguste Renoir, photographed by Edgar Degas in 1895

The later Mallarmé was also a generous correspondent and host. He helped younger writers, visited artists, arranged meetings, and took part in public debates. Rosemary Lloyd shows that friendship was not outside his art. His circle gave him readers, artistic exchange, and a living form of the community that his theory often imagined.[136]

The two figures belong together. Solitary composition and social speech were different stages of one practice. The private page could later enter a reading, book, letter, gift, or Tuesday conversation.[137]

Sound and meaning

[change | change source]

Mallarmé gave great value to sound. He chose vowels, consonants, rhyme, and rhythm with care. Some readers therefore say that his poetry is mainly music made from words.[111]

Words are not pure tones. They carry dictionary meanings, grammar, history, and social use. Mallarmé's sound patterns change meaning because they act through language. A repeated sound can join two ideas; it does not replace them.[111]

Suzanne Bernard strongly rejects the view that Mallarmé wished to put pleasant sound before logical meaning. For her, his “music” is the total organisation of verbal relations.[138]

The work of the reader

[change | change source]

Mallarmé requires active reading. The reader connects separated words, completes missing links, tests several meanings, and gives the printed signs a voice. This makes the reader a participant.[64]

The reader does not create anything at will. The poem gives strong limits through wording, order, rhyme, page form, and literary history. Reading is a meeting between designed structure and new performance.[64]

This balance helps explain Mallarmé's later importance. Modern criticism often studies the role of the reader, the instability of meaning, and the material sign. Mallarmé had already made these questions part of poetic form.[64]

Influence and legacy

[change | change source]

Mallarmé's direct published output was small, but his influence was large. It passed through personal teaching, rare books, posthumous editions, music, theatre, visual art, and literary theory.[76]

Symbolism

[change | change source]

Mallarmé did not invent Symbolism by himself. Baudelaire, Verlaine, Rimbaud, Villiers, and many others helped form it. Younger writers still treated him as one of its main masters.[139]

His importance came from both poems and speech. The Mardis gave younger Symbolists a place to hear ideas about suggestion, verse, myth, music, and the book. He did not issue a clear programme. This allowed very different writers to claim part of his example.[139]

Symbolist drama drew from his wish to reduce normal action and make stage objects into signs. Block traces this effect from Mallarmé's dramatic writing and theory toward the early Symbolist theatre.[139]

Valéry, Gide, and Claudel

[change | change source]

Paul Valéry regarded Mallarmé as a decisive master. He learned from the older poet's exact labour, distrust of easy inspiration, and idea of the poem as a made system. Valéry did not simply repeat Mallarmé. His own work often became more analytical and more openly concerned with the mind observing itself.[140]

André Gide attended the Tuesdays and admired Mallarmé's freedom from ordinary literary ambition. Gide's prose later followed other paths, but the example of a life organised around the demands of art remained important.[140]

Paul Claudel heard Mallarmé while developing his own Christian and dramatic poetry. He took from him the scale of poetic speech and the possibility of a new theatre, even though Claudel's religious certainty differed sharply from Mallarmé's doubt.[140]

Modernism and the avant-garde

[change | change source]

Mallarmé helped prepare modernism. His broken syntax, impersonal voice, use of myth, and attention to the material page appear again in several twentieth-century movements.[108]

Un coup de dés was especially important to visual poetry, Futurist typography, Dada, concrete poetry, and artists' books. Not all later experiments came directly from Mallarmé, but his poem gave a major early example of the page as an active field.[108]

His unfinished Book also attracted the avant-garde. Artists who wished to join art and life, text and event, or book and performance could see him as a predecessor. Mary Lewis Shaw argues that his work is at once strongly traditional and formally revolutionary. This double position helps explain why both modernist and postmodernist critics return to him.[141]

Poetry in other languages

[change | change source]

Mallarmé affected poets outside France through translation and criticism. His work mattered to W. B. Yeats, T. S. Eliot, Wallace Stevens, and later experimental poets, although each received him through a different path.[142]

Translation is difficult because French gender, syntax, rhyme, and sound cannot all be carried into English at once. A very clear translation may remove the useful uncertainty. A very literal translation may become unnatural. The translators of Guy Michaud's study explain that they kept some unusual word order because a smooth English version could turn Mallarmé's ambiguity into a simple explanation.[58]

For this reason, readers often use more than one translation and keep the French text beside it. Translation does not give a final substitute. It gives another performance of the poem.[58]

Music and dance after Mallarmé

[change | change source]

Debussy's Prélude remains the best-known musical response. Ravel's Trois poèmes de Stéphane Mallarmé and Boulez's Pli selon pli show two later stages. Ravel sets the voice in a clear but changing chamber texture. Boulez spreads fragments and poems across a large musical architecture.[111]

Nijinsky's ballet made the faun central to modern dance. Later choreographers continued to remake the poem and Debussy score. The history shows the open form of Mallarmé's influence: one poem becomes a meeting point for book art, orchestra, body, photography, and stage design.[111]

Philosophy and literary theory

[change | change source]

Twentieth-century philosophers and critics found major questions in Mallarmé. Maurice Blanchot studied the relation between literature, absence, and the impossible work. Jean-Paul Sartre read Mallarmé through history, class, and Nothingness. Jacques Derrida studied the play of signs, fold, blank, and undecidable meaning. Julia Kristeva linked his broken syntax with a revolution in poetic language.[143]

These readings often disagree. Some make Mallarmé a late idealist. Others make him a predecessor of post-structuralism. Shaw argues that the contradiction should not simply be removed: his texts preserve old forms while exposing their limits.[144]

Several scholars have warned that large theories can make the individual poems disappear from view. The close readings of Chadwick, Cohn, Franklin, and Richard keep metre, grammar, objects, publication history, and voice beside philosophical interpretation.[144]

The modern book

[change | change source]

Mallarmé changed the idea of the book even where readers do not know his poems. Modern page design, artists' books, typographic poetry, and digital text all use space as part of meaning.[108]

His work does not predict the Internet in a simple way. The physical fold, paper, and sequence were central to him. Still, his idea of several reading paths and variable relation between parts has become newly visible in digital culture.[108]

The Book also raises questions that remain current. Who controls the order of a work? Is the reader a user, spectator, or performer? Can a text be both fixed and variable? How do material design and abstract meaning act together?[108]

Museums, manuscripts, and places

[change | change source]
A house beside a river
The house at Valvins, in Vulaines-sur-Seine, is now a museum

Mallarmé's house at Valvins is now a museum. Its room, garden, river, furniture, and personal objects show the material scale of his life and the daily setting in which abstract projects were made. Biographical critics such as Mondor and Lloyd nevertheless distinguish this setting from a claim that every poem directly records an event in the poet's life.[12]

Manuscripts are held in several libraries and collections. They reveal deletions, arrows, page plans, calculations, and changes of title. In Mallarmé's case, the manuscript is often more than a step toward the printed text. It can preserve another possible organisation.[12]

The 1914 edition of Un coup de dés and later facsimiles made the typographic work more available. Editors still face choices about typeface, page size, spacing, and the relation between autograph and print. A modern edition can never be completely neutral.[12]

Critical importance and limits

[change | change source]

Mallarmé joined an extreme idea of poetry with an ordinary life of work, family, friendship, and limited means. He did not produce the great completed Book that he imagined. He did produce a group of poems and prose works that changed what a poem, page, and reading could be.[76]

Critics from Fowlie and Richard to Shaw have stressed the relation between exact form and open meaning. The poems are not free clouds of suggestion; they are carefully made structures. At the same time, they do not close into one lesson. Their words continue to act differently when read aloud, translated, printed in another form, or placed beside music and dance.[144]

Lewis and Shaw also identify limits in this project. The difficult language can exclude readers, and Mallarmé's statements about an elite public can be socially narrow. His writing about women and dancers sometimes turns living persons into ideal signs. His hope for a universal ritual remained an untested plan. These problems form part of the critical history of the work rather than an answer outside it.[144]

Mallarmé's lasting importance is usually placed in the questions opened by his work rather than in agreement with every theory he proposed. His poems and prose made basic parts of literature newly visible: the material word, the absent object, the active reader, the fold of the book, the public voice, and the chance present in every act of form.[76]

Selected works

[change | change source]

The date given is the date of first publication as a book or in a magazine. Several works were written over many years, and some were only made public by other people after Mallarmé's death.[145]

Published during his life

[change | change source]
DateTitleTitle in EnglishKindNotes
From 1864 Hérodiade Herodias Poetry Dramatic poem, never finished; parts appeared in magazines during his life
1875 Le Corbeau The Raven Translation Poe's poem in French, with pictures by Manet[27]
1876 L'Après-midi d'un faune The Afternoon of a Faun Poetry Dramatic monologue in book form, also with pictures by Manet
1878 Les Mots anglais English Words School book Full title: Petite philologie à l'usage des classes et du monde: les mots anglais[146]
1880 Les Dieux antiques The Ancient Gods School book Adapted from a book on myth by the English writer George Cox[146]
1887 Album de vers et de prose Album of Verse and Prose Collection Published in Brussels
1887 Poésies Poems Poetry Lyric poems and sonnets, written mainly from the 1860s to the 1890s; a fuller edition appeared in 1899
1891 Pages Pages Collection Published in Brussels
1893 Vers et prose Verse and Prose Collection Published in Paris
1895 La Musique et les Lettres Music and Letters Lecture Given at Oxford and Cambridge in 1894[147]
1897 Divagations Divagations Prose Prose poems, essays, and criticism, chosen and arranged by Mallarmé
1897 Un coup de dés jamais n'abolira le hasard A Throw of the Dice Will Never Abolish Chance Poetry First printed in the magazine Cosmopolis; book edition in 1914[107]

Published after his death

[change | change source]
DateTitleTitle in EnglishKindNotes
1925 Igitur, ou la Folie d'Elbehnon Igitur, or Elbehnon's Madness Prose Story left unfinished, written mainly between 1869 and 1871[148]
1957 Le Livre The Book Notes Plans and calculations for an ideal book, edited by Jacques Scherer[149]
1959 Les Noces d'Hérodiade The Wedding of Herodias Poetry Later parts of the Hérodiade project
1961 Pour un tombeau d'Anatole For a Tomb for Anatole Notes Written after the death of his son in 1879, edited by Jean-Pierre Richard[150]

References

[change | change source]
  1. 1 2 3 St. Aubyn 1989, p. 3.
  2. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 17–31.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Shaw 1993, pp. 171–196.
  4. ↑ Bernard 1959, pp. 7–12, 37–54.
  5. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 2, 179–182.
  6. ↑ Mondor 1950, pp. 10–12.
  7. 1 2 St. Aubyn 1989, p. 1.
  8. ↑ Walzer 1963, pp. 7–22.
  9. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 15–21.
  10. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, p. 17.
  11. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 25–44.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Mondor 1950.
  13. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 28.
  14. ↑ Michaud 1965, pp. 17–32.
  15. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 1–2.
  16. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 21.
  17. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 25.
  18. ↑ Fowlie 1953, pp. 11–16.
  19. ↑ Walzer 1963, pp. 36–44.
  20. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 64.
  21. ↑ Walzer 1963, pp. 64–66.
  22. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 46.
  23. ↑ Walzer 1963, pp. 140–142.
  24. 1 2 3 4 5 Michaud 1965, pp. 49–100.
  25. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 54.
  26. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 154.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Lloyd 1999, p. 126.
  28. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 122–126.
  29. 1 2 3 Lloyd 1999, pp. 122–123.
  30. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, p. 81.
  31. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 130, 149.
  32. ↑ Lloyd 1999, p. 2.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 Lloyd 1999, p. 221.
  34. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 174–182.
  35. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 179–182.
  36. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 60–62.
  37. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 128, 166–201.
  38. ↑ Lloyd 1999, p. 105.
  39. ↑ Lloyd 1999, p. 154.
  40. ↑ Lloyd 1999, p. 144.
  41. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 248.
  42. ↑ Walzer 1963, p. 246.
  43. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 17–18.
  44. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 18–19.
  45. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 17–35.
  46. ↑ Abastado 1970, p. 19.
  47. ↑ Delfel 1951, pp. 133–135.
  48. ↑ Delfel 1951, pp. 121–122.
  49. ↑ Delfel 1951, pp. 150–152.
  50. ↑ Delfel 1951, pp. 55–78.
  51. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 32–35.
  52. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 42–43.
  53. ↑ Royère 1931, pp. 83–104.
  54. ↑ Abastado 1970, pp. 45–46.
  55. ↑ Chadwick 1962, p. 66.
  56. ↑ Chadwick 1962, p. 113.
  57. ↑ Chadwick 1962, pp. 26, 115.
  58. 1 2 3 Michaud 1965, pp. vii–viii.
  59. 1 2 Fowlie 1953, p. 106.
  60. 1 2 Fowlie 1953, pp. 90–124.
  61. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 120.
  62. ↑ Michaud 1965, pp. 45, 47.
  63. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 44.
  64. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Lewis 1976.
  65. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 183–205.
  66. 1 2 3 Shaw 1993, p. 186.
  67. 1 2 Shaw 1993, pp. 197–238.
  68. ↑ Shaw 1993, p. 200.
  69. ↑ Richard 1961, pp. 17–35.
  70. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Richard 1961.
  71. ↑ Richard 1961, pp. 83–111.
  72. 1 2 3 Fowlie 1953, pp. 95–96.
  73. 1 2 Fowlie 1953, pp. 63–89.
  74. ↑ Fowlie 1953, pp. 212–230.
  75. ↑ Mallarmé 2019a.
  76. 1 2 3 4 5 6 St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 137–143.
  77. 1 2 Royère 1931, p. 154.
  78. ↑ Royère 1931, p. 116.
  79. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 26–27.
  80. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 31–32.
  81. ↑ Royère 1931, pp. 152, 156.
  82. ↑ Royère 1931, pp. 31–67.
  83. 1 2 3 Block 1963, pp. 9–12.
  84. 1 2 Block 1963, pp. 5–35.
  85. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 38–61.
  86. 1 2 3 4 5 Fowlie 1953, pp. 148–170.
  87. ↑ Fowlie 1953, pp. 147–148.
  88. 1 2 3 4 5 Block 1963, pp. 36–51.
  89. ↑ Block 1963, p. 36.
  90. 1 2 3 4 5 Franklin 1975, pp. 11–17.
  91. 1 2 3 Franklin 1975, pp. 118–158.
  92. ↑ Franklin 1975, pp. 53–65.
  93. ↑ Franklin 1975, pp. 66–80.
  94. ↑ Franklin 1975, pp. 93–107.
  95. ↑ Franklin 1975, pp. 173–208.
  96. ↑ Cohn 1987, pp. 1–18.
  97. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 69–93.
  98. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 42–44.
  99. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, p. 91.
  100. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, p. 77.
  101. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 93–98.
  102. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 93–96.
  103. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 96–98.
  104. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 94–116.
  105. 1 2 Shaw 1993, p. 49.
  106. 1 2 Shaw 1993, pp. 8–18.
  107. 1 2 Shaw 1993, p. 176.
  108. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shaw 1993, pp. 239–258.
  109. ↑ Bernard 1959, pp. 11–38.
  110. 1 2 Lloyd 1999, pp. 126, 128–129.
  111. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Bernard 1959.
  112. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 71–85.
  113. ↑ Block 1963, pp. 83–100.
  114. ↑ Block 1963, pp. 83–134.
  115. ↑ Block 1963, pp. 29, 69.
  116. 1 2 Shaw 1993, pp. 2, 174.
  117. ↑ Fowlie 1953, p. 147.
  118. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 155–182.
  119. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 7, 14.
  120. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 1–3.
  121. ↑ Lewis 1976, pp. 17–45, 206–230.
  122. 1 2 3 4 Abastado 1970, pp. 31–63.
  123. 1 2 3 4 Shaw 1993, pp. 19–48.
  124. 1 2 3 Chadwick 1962, pp. 66, 113.
  125. 1 2 Delfel 1951, pp. 12–17.
  126. 1 2 St. Aubyn 1989, pp. 121–122.
  127. 1 2 Delfel 1951, pp. 17–40.
  128. 1 2 3 4 Royère 1931, pp. 69–108.
  129. ↑ Michaud 1965, pp. 45–88.
  130. ↑ Chadwick 1962, pp. 43–86.
  131. ↑ Fowlie 1953, pp. 29–124.
  132. ↑ Richard 1961, pp. 37–381.
  133. 1 2 3 Walzer 1963, pp. 95–137.
  134. ↑ Mondor 1950, pp. 357–489.
  135. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 27–65.
  136. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 156–165, 179–182.
  137. ↑ Lloyd 1999, pp. 19–26.
  138. ↑ Bernard 1959, pp. 7–27.
  139. 1 2 3 Block 1963, pp. 101–134.
  140. 1 2 3 Lloyd 1999, pp. 166–201.
  141. ↑ Shaw 1993, pp. 1–18, 239–258.
  142. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 122.
  143. ↑ Shaw 1993, pp. 21, 143.
  144. 1 2 3 4 Shaw 1993, pp. 1–12.
  145. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, pp. xi–xiii.
  146. 1 2 Michaud 1965, p. 96.
  147. ↑ Shaw 1993, p. 43.
  148. ↑ Fowlie 1953, p. 104.
  149. ↑ Michaud 1965, p. 171.
  150. ↑ St. Aubyn 1989, p. 150.
  • Abastado, Claude (1970). Expérience et théorie de la création poétique chez Mallarmé (in French). Minard.
  • Bernard, Suzanne (1959). Mallarmé et la musique (in French). Librairie Nizet.
  • Block, Haskell M. (1963). Mallarmé and the Symbolist Drama. Wayne State University Press.
  • Chadwick, Charles (1962). Mallarmé: sa pensée dans sa poésie (in French). José Corti.
  • Cohn, Robert Greer (1987). Mallarmé's Prose Poems: A Critical Study. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-32552-3.
  • Delfel, Guy (1951). L'Esthétique de Stéphane Mallarmé (in French). Flammarion.
  • Fowlie, Wallace (1953). Mallarmé. University of Chicago Press.
  • Franklin, Ursula (1976). An Anatomy of Poesis: The Prose Poems of Stéphane Mallarmé. University of North Carolina, Department of Romance Languages. ISBN 978-0-88438-016-0.
  • Lewis, Paula Gilbert (1976). The Aesthetics of Stéphane Mallarmé in Relation to His Public. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. ISBN 978-0-8386-1615-4.
  • Lloyd, Rosemary (1999). Mallarmé: The Poet and His Circle. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-3662-8.
  • Mallarmé, Stéphane (2005). Steinmetz, Jean-Luc (ed.). Poésies et autres textes (in French). Le Livre de Poche. ISBN 978-2-253-08102-9.
  • Michaud, Guy (1965). Mallarmé. Translated by Marie Collins and Bertha Humez. New York University Press.
  • Mondor, Henri (1950). Vie de Mallarmé (in French). Gallimard.
  • Richard, Jean-Pierre (1961). L'Univers imaginaire de Mallarmé (in French). Éditions du Seuil.
  • Royère, Jean (1931). Mallarmé (in French). Albert Messein.
  • Shaw, Mary Lewis (1993). Performance in the Texts of Mallarmé: The Passage from Art to Ritual. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 978-0-271-00807-3.
  • St. Aubyn, F. C. (1989). Stéphane Mallarmé (Updated ed.). Twayne Publishers. ISBN 978-0-8057-8254-7.
  • Walzer, Pierre-Olivier (1963). Essai sur Stéphane Mallarmé (in French). Éditions Seghers.

Further reading

[change | change source]

Other websites

[change | change source]